National Novel Writing Month may not know who I am, but I’m declaring war on it.  That’s right, with big ol’ gnarly swords and axes ‘n shit.  A splash of gooey crimson, a length of pinkish-white entrails, smelling of iron and heat and death, and we’ll have a nice little battle.  Who cares if it’s one-sided?

Disclaimer:  My brand-new chair just dumped me on my ass, so I’m a little pissed.

Why NaNoWriMo is the Devil’s gift to writers:

Look at writing as a ladder.  At the very top—way up on the last possible step, where it’s terrifying to let go lest writer meet dirt in violent fashion—is where each writer could potentially climb.  Climb a little farther, grasp another wooden dowel, then another, and they’ll eventually reach it.  Hopefully.  The problem is that most writers never get off the first rung.

Why?

Because they don’t learn the fundamentals.  They never learn how to structure a sentence, when to properly use an adverb, the dangers of infinite verb-phrases, the boring depths of passive voice, the terrors of SOB verbs, or countless other bottomless pits.

Writing a good story isn’t half of the ladder.  Nope, not even half.  Yes, self-editing plays a part in there somewhere, but look at it this way—even with self-editing, our example writer only climbs ten rungs, or fifteen.  However, if they are at rung number fifteen when they start, then they’ll reach twenty or twenty-five at the end of their self-edits.  Add in an editor, and they may even reach to the thirtieth.

And this, folks, is where my problem with NaNoWriMo comes in.  The program doesn’t encourage writers to write well, it simply encourages them to write.  It reinforces bad writing habits that end up taking months or years to erase.  In many cases, those bad habits are never fully eradicated.  Let me be perfectly clear here, no editor, no matter how good, can clean up a manuscript that’s sloppy to begin with.  The better the base material, the better the end product.  That also goes for self-editing.

Yes, there are exceptions.  Some writers start off with NaNoWriMo and go on to be published.  In fact, we’ve even got one or two at Evolved Publishing, and they’ve proven themselves as gifted and dedicated writers.  However, those are exceptions.  I don’t want to make up a bogus figure off the top of my head, but how many writers start with NaNoWriMo and then go on to be published?  Judging by the hordes of submissions we’ve received, I’d guess not many.

Learn the fundamentals first.  I mean seriously, a racecar diver doesn’t compete in the Daytona 500 without first learning how their car works.  Go slow.  A mechanic doesn’t attempt to swap an engine until he learns his tools, completes a brake job or two, and works his way up that ladder.

A new bloody writer shouldn’t try to write a novel in a month.

Yes, quality is more important than quantity, because it cuts down on those aforementioned bad habits.  I swear to the ever-living god, those things breed faster than a horde of zombie bunnies.  Kill them.  Kill them all!

Buy books like Strunk & White’s Elements of Style or Renni & Brown’s Self-Editing for Fiction Writers and study the crap out of them.  Go take a grammar class at a community college, or buy Sin and Syntax by Constance Hale.  It’s possible to teach yourself through experience, but only if you actually teach yourself.  Writing at break-neck speed isn’t learning.  Take this month to do that, instead of writing whatever pops into your skull.

And, if you do indeed decide to embark on NaNoWriMo, throw their goal out the window.  Writing as fast as possible isn’t a goal, it’s a death sentence, and these writers are only hurting themselves.

 

 

 

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011 at 10:34 pm and is filed under Thoughts, Uncategorized, Writing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

16 Comments(+Add)

1   Kimberly Kinrade (@KimberlyKinrade)    http://KimberlyKinrade.com
November 1st, 2011 at 11:01 pm

LMAO So I shouldn’t mention that I’m doing NaNoWriMo? Actually, I’m only doing it because I’m so damn behind on my very realistic publishing goal of a book a month. Can you believe I didn’t get out another book in October. Only something as extreme as NaNoWriMo can correct this terrible disregard for publishing deadlines.

Now I have to go, because these words so do not count on my wordcount for today. :p

2   Lane Diamond    http://www.LaneDiamond.com
November 1st, 2011 at 11:20 pm

Well, this could be an interesting conversation. I once called it NoMoNaNo – NoWayNotEver.

Writers suffer a kind of group think, and nowhere is that more evident than in the ridiculous exercise called NaNoWriMo.

3   Michael A Tate    http://michaelatate.blogspot.com
November 1st, 2011 at 11:29 pm

I think NaNoWriMo can be done and actually done well IF the writer has a really good grasp of structure and has done lots of planning ahead of time. Then the writing really becomes a matter of making the scenes work, and that can be done.

But yes, some bad writing habits can be formed by somebody just doing it on a whim. But I think there are also more beneficial habits that can be formed, like writing each day.

Lets just hope nobody expects a publishable novel come Dec 1 :)

4   D.T. Conklin    
November 1st, 2011 at 11:36 pm

I really do agree with you, Michael. Sadly, I don’t think enough writers have a good grasp o’f those fundamentals. EDIT: Well, I don’t think the pro outweighs the con, but I agree that it *can* be done.

Start at the start, I always say.

5   Leigh K. Hunt    
November 2nd, 2011 at 12:33 am

Wow, amazingly – I agree with your sentiments. When I clicked the link to this blog, I was prepared to fight you with fire over this one… but I actually agree.

I have been writing for years – even particpating NaNoWriMo for years as well. I have two very very crap MS drafts from Nano. I also have a very good draft of a book that I did for Nano last year. I used NaNoWriMo to write the second book of a planned trilogy. The book is actually about 90k… but I focused and wrote the first 50k during NaNoWriMo.

But, after all these years of writing, I don’t think that it was a fluke that last years efforts were rather successful. That trilogy has been planned for years, and NaNo helped me get a great jump start on the second book.

This year – I am once again participating in NaNoWriMo, however, I’m doing it more NaNoEdMo styles. I haven’t finished editing and revising a MS that I really need to send out to the masses… And since I have 50k remaining to editing and revise – I am doing this instead of actually writing 50k. Much less stressful, and it’s the final edit on a book. (Not written during a NaNoWriMo, btw.)

So. I agree with you. All writers should most definitely learn the basics before launching their writing careers with NaNoWriMo. But I still love it, because it gives me one month to take up the opportunity to play with something that I might have just left in the slush pile.

6   Patti Larsen    
November 2nd, 2011 at 1:01 am

Can we be honest here and not blame it on a simple writing exercise? There are tons of writers out there who write badly whether they participate in NaNo or not–having a grudge against a process that allows people who don’t get to be creative most of the year is silly, really. Maybe you should be harsher on the education system and less on a fun process that brings people together for a month of writing debauchery.

7   D.T. Conklin    
November 2nd, 2011 at 2:06 am

Leigh, Thanks for stopping by and commenting :) . I do think NaNoWriMo can work for some people, but I think new writers need to be careful.

Patti, I totally agree with you that there are bad writers out there, whether or not they participate in NaNo. However, why do they get to only be creative in November? To me, that sounds silly, and kind of like an excuse. Stand up for what you want to do and make the time all year round.

Harsher on the education system? Uhm, I basically failed grammar in HS–I only passed because the teacher liked me. It wasn’t the schools fault; I failed because I didn’t care. I didn’t try. I didn’t learn. Now, maybe I still can’t write worth a darn–that’s up to someone other than me to judge–but in my mind it’s up to the individual to learn. I don’t think churning out 50k words in a month is the way, but that’s just my opinion. Blaming it on the education system, again, sounds like an excuse. There are enough books, classes, and groups to overcome that barrier, for the writer who actually wants to learn.

Of course, this then begs the question: is my entire argument an excuse? Sure. Maybe. It could be an excuse for all the unskilled writers out there. It could be an excuse because I’m pissy and my chair fell over :D . Again, I suppose that’s for each person to decide on their own.

As far as it being fun–you’ve got me there. I’m sure it’s a blast :) . My point in all of this is that I’m not sure the cons of it outweigh the pros, especially for new writers. For writers like yourself, or Kimberly, or Lane, the circumstances are a little different. Sorry Leigh and Michael, I haven’t read your work yet :P .

8   Angela Scott    http://www.whimsywritingandreading.weebly.com
November 2nd, 2011 at 3:28 am

I still think you’re being silly about the whole thing. Really I do.

If a whole group of people, worldwide, decided that in the month of June to create an art piece by putting paint on a canvas, we would call it amazing. YES! The world loves art! Yippee! We wouldn’t care if if someone slapped their hand in paint and placed it on the canvas or if someone else painted the most brilliant landscape. We wouldn’t care. We would be thrilled that the world embraced something creative and did it collectively.

But when it comes to writing, for some weird reason, elitist writers shun the newbies (sorry if that comes of harsh) who attempt to write a 50K novel in a month. What does it matter? Really? What do the top-notch writers have to fear? If top-notch writers write amazing work, then they shouldn’t be afraid at all. Cream rises to the top. The best will continue to shine.

Nanowrimo is supposed to be fun. It gets people, who probably wouldn’t write otherwise, to write. What’s so bad about that? So what if it’s crap. Big deal. People are writing and that needs to mean something.

Back to my art example, it’s like someone telling a new artist–DON”T PAINT! You don’t know what you’re doing! You don’t know what brush to hold or which hues work. So until your art is Monet worthy, keep to yourself, do it on your own, and don’t you dare show it to anyone.

Writing slowly in NO way assures a masterpiece in writing. Some writers work on the same WIP for years and it’s still crap. So we can’t assume that just because something is written fast that it equals crap either.

Yes, writers should edit. Yes, writers should perfect their craft. Yes, writers should . . . blah, blah, blah.

But that’s not the point of nanowrimo. The point is to write.

And again I say, what’s so wrong about that?

You can read more of my opinion here on this topic: http://whimsywritingandreading.weebly.com/2/post/2011/10/whats-so-wrong-with-nanowrimo-i-dont-understand-all-the-hate.html

Oh, and D.T–I still think you’re pretty awesome even if you’re a nano hater :)

9   D.T. Conklin    
November 2nd, 2011 at 3:59 am

I’m not shunning newbies! I’m saying to learn the fundamentals first–that’s all. And I’m not afraid, why would I be? If you look at my argument, I’m trying to get the overall quality to get better, not poorer. I *want* new writers to get better. I want them to be better than I am, or you, or Lane. I want them to be the best evarrrrrr. I really, really do! I’m simply trying to encourage in a different direction. How is that any worse than, say, having someone tell you to write 50k in a single month? By your argument, I could just as easily say supporters of NaNo are elitest and shunning newbies :) . I disagree with NaNoWriMo’s method, that’s all.

In your artist example, I’m not telling anyone to not write. I’m not telling them to keep it to themselves. I’m saying learn the fundamentals first, and *then* go crazy.

I suppose this comes down to what said writer wants to do with their writing life. If it’s just for fun, something to blow of steam, a way to interact with other people, then NaNo is super awesome. However, if they really want to get their skills up to professional levels as quickly as possible, then I think they’re making a bad choice. Yes, it’s possible to get those skills to a professional level even if writers participate in NaNo, but I think it will happen slower. They’ll have to nix all those bad habits.

Maybe I’m just an silly, elitest curmudgeon :D . And no worries, you’re pretty awesome too. Life would be pretty boring if we all agreed on everything haha.

So… can I change my signature in the Evolved Forums to NaNo hater? I’m totally gonna do it :lol: .

10   Moses Siregar III    http://sciencefictionfantasybooks.net
November 2nd, 2011 at 6:49 pm

I agree with you about the importance of studying the craft of writing (!), but I disagree with you overall.

NaNo is great for getting people to write and finish something. The peer pressure is a huge tool. I know it helped me two years ago (now my novel is out there).

The old “Don’t get it right, get it written” and “Writers finish … stuff” (I can’t remember how that one goes) are great cliches.

But, bravo to you for reminding folks that you have to study your craft, too.

All in all, I am pro-NaNo.

11   L.M. Stull    http://lmstull.com
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:06 pm

I have to be honest. I’m not a big fan of Nano either. I did it last year and totally rushed myself. I do write every day, but having a full time job and life, I don’t always reach 1667 words, so I found myself forcing myself to catch up near the end… I paid for it later with the edits. I ended up completely rewriting the novel from scratch. ha. And don’t anyone kill me, but I honestly felt like NaNo was one big popularity contest. I’m glad some people enjoy it, and if it inspires others to write, I’m glad. But for me, no thanks. I’ll stick to my own schedule.

And btw, GREAT BLOG POST! :)

12   D.T. Conklin    
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:11 pm

Fair enough, Sir Moses, you evil pot-stirrer, you :D . I do consider you one of the exceptions–you’ve done a great job with Black God’s War, and I know that started out as a NaNo project.

I’ll even plug it here: Moses’s Book!

13   D.T. Conklin    
November 2nd, 2011 at 7:15 pm

Thanks, L.M.! I know what you mean about, “Don’t anyone kill me, but….” I feel like looking out the window to see if if there’s a sniper crouched on the neighbor’s roof. Nope, I’m safe for now.

*hides again*

14   Evil Fish    
November 8th, 2011 at 4:18 pm

I wonder how much more your average editor makes during this little event.

‘Hey, I just wrote 50k words this month, can you edit it for me?’ $$$

Editor conspiracy….I think yes!

15   Tim Ward    http://timothycward.com
November 12th, 2011 at 5:01 am

You have a good point, D.T., and it’s one I’ve been thinking hard on lately. I signed up for nano this year knowing I had editing projects for smaller pieces, but thinking I would still be able to do it. I also came at it with 47k already written, so I was using it as motivation to finish the novel.

The snag I’ve hit is that the editing projects are more beneficial to me right now because I’m in the midst of some fundamental style changes. I’m asking myself why I’d write 50k more into my book before I mastered these stylistic advancements…and concluding that the editing and style must come first. This will save me time in the end and just sounds more logical than doing nano because I don’t want to be a quitter.

Nano was helpful in getting me to start both novels I finished, but writing fast also meant not thinking about what I wrote, taking notes, and evaluating if I was on the right path. Both of those novels now need rewritten. I’m working on the second right now, and am passing the year mark since I started on this project. I need a more efficient, faster way to write a book; I can’t keep rewriting the first draft.

So, I’m backing off the pressure of hitting 50k and doing what is best for my writing.

16   Andrew    http://139-23.blogspot.com
November 12th, 2011 at 1:48 pm

I have to partially agree with you. I discovered NaNo a couple years ago when I was plodding through editing my second novel. I skipped it because frankly, November is a really bad month for most people, myself included :P

This year, I’m actually giving it a shot. I’m on schedule, and I’ve just set aside 45 minutes a day to write. If I meet the goal, great. So far I haven’t missed yet.

And let me tell you – this novel is garbage. Pure one hundred percent garbage. I could chuck it in the garbage bin on December 1 and the world would be better off. NaNo drafts are not even first draft quality. There may be someone who can pour four hours a day into their 1667 and really come up with some fine writing, but I ain’t it. I don’t have four hours a day, though I wish I did.

My conclusion is pretty similar to yours. I own Self-Editing for Fiction Writers and I’ve read it cover to cover three or four times, many more when you count the times I’ll read a chapter just to brush up. It’s excellent.

Then again, I can also see where some people in the comments are coming from. If it weren’t for NaNo, I wouldn’t have 18k on this novel currently. I wouldn’t have this novel at all. Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing; I’ll let you decide.

Thanks for the great post!

Cheers,
Andrew

One Trackback/Ping

  1. D.T. Conklin » Blog Archive » Naoaoaoaoaoaoaoa! It can’t beeeeee!    Nov 08 2011 / 4pm:

    [...] it’s now day 8 of my war with NaNoWriMo.  It’s not going well.  These bastards just keep writing and writing, and it seems nothing [...]

Leave a reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment